This paper examines whether the systematic risk of stocks listed on the Republican Stock Exchange “Toshkent” is stable over time and whether conventional CAPM betas are distorted by non-synchronous trading. Using daily excess returns of four actively traded issuers – Hamkorbank (HMKB), Qizilqumsement (QZSM), Uzsanoatqurilishbank (SQB) and Uzmetkombinat (UZMK) – against the UCI index over 4 July 2022 – 30 June 2026, rolling CAPM betas are estimated with 60-, 120- and 180-observation windows, parameter stability is tested with a beta–time interaction regression and the supF test of Andrews (1993), and OLS betas are compared with the Dimson (1979) and Scholes–Williams (1977) estimators. Rolling betas display substantial temporal variation: the beta of UZMK ranges from −0.45 to 1.28, and SQB exhibits a significant upward trend (p = 0.036), although no discrete structural break is detected. Full-sample OLS betas are close to zero and insignificant, and the market factor explains less than 2% of daily return variation. Dimson and Scholes–Williams corrections raise betas by up to 0.09 points for SQB and UZMK – the stocks with the highest share of zero-return days – yet lagged and leading market returns are never jointly significant. The evidence supports time-varying beta but offers only weak support for a systematic non-synchronous-trading bias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rakhimov Abdukhalil Toshbotirovich (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: