Mapping functional brain organization between species is a prerequisite for translating connectivity biomarkers from animal models to patients, but connectivity-based correspondence has been demonstrated almost exclusively in primates. We tested whether canine–human network homology can be recovered from functional connectivity alone, using only five network-level anatomical priors, and benchmarked a spectral manifold alignment framework (Laplacian-eigenmap embedding with Procrustes alignment on network centroids) against a simple connectivity-signature matching baseline. Data comprised resting-state fMRI from 15 canines with endovascular permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pre-occlusion baseline and hyperacute post-occlusion sessions) and two public OpenNeuro datasets: 29 chronic-phase post-stroke aphasia patients scanned before and after rehabilitation (ds003999) and 10 healthy controls (ds000224). Held-out canine–human network homologies were recovered well above chance (top-5 network correspondence up to 54.5% vs. permutation null ≈ 18%, p = 0.002 ), and correspondence followed the evolutionary cortical hierarchy: visual and somatomotor homologies were recovered several-fold above chance, default-mode only weakly—extending a gradient previously described in primates to a carnivore. Notably, simple signature matching (54.5%) outperformed manifold alignment (35.5%), indicating that the homology signal is strong enough to be captured without embedding machinery at translational cohort sizes. Within species, canine network metrics showed no treatment-arm differences (all p > 0.3 ), and chronic-phase patients did not differ from controls in modularity ( p = 0.93 ); a sensitivity analysis bounds these nulls. All results are fully reproducible from shared code and public data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Warioba et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: