Arsenic (As) contamination in paddy soils poses a potential risk to rice safety, while sulfate fertilization may reduce As bioavailability through sulfur-mediated redox processes. However, the dose-dependent effects of sulfate (SO 4 2− ) under flooded–drained conditions remain poorly understood. Here, a pot experiment was conducted with four K 2 SO 4 application rates (0, 50, 100, and 200 mg K 2 SO 4 kg −1 soil) to investigate changes in porewater chemistry, soil As fractions, bacterial communities, and As accumulation in rice during the heading, grain-filling, and maturity stages. Thermodynamic simulations were further performed based on porewater geochemical conditions. The 100 mg K 2 SO 4 kg −1 soil treatment resulted in the greatest SO 4 2− consumption (∼70%) and the highest sulfide (S 2− ) concentration, reaching 350 mg L −1 . Desulfobacca , the dominant genus associated with SO 4 2− reduction, also reached its highest relative abundance under this treatment. Concurrently, dissolved iron (Fe) and As concentrations decreased, whereas solid-phase As retention increased, consistent with enhanced As immobilization associated with Fe sulfide (Fe–S) precipitation. In contrast, the 200 mg K 2 SO 4 kg −1 soil treatment generated less S 2− and showed weaker As immobilization. Grain As concentration decreased by 48% under the 100 mg K 2 SO 4 kg −1 soil treatment, compared with only 26% under the 200 mg K 2 SO 4 kg −1 soil treatment. These results demonstrate a non-linear SO 4 2− dose response, with an intermediate application rate promoting microbial SO 4 2− reduction and Fe–S formation, thereby decreasing porewater As bioavailability and its accumulation in rice grains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: