Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) navigation-measurement spoofing is a critical threat to autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) because deceptive measurements may remain numerically plausible while progressively corrupting the navigation state. This paper presents an integrity-aware hierarchical navigation framework designed to maintain mission continuity under GNSS spoofing and subsequent degradation of the LiDAR–inertial fallback. During nominal operation, GNSS is cross-validated against an independent LiDAR–IMU error-state Kalman filter solution using normalized innovation squared (NIS), persistence logic, and cumulative change evidence. Suspect GNSS measurements are quarantined, after which LiDAR–inertial navigation maintains local continuity while a secondary integrity monitor evaluates innovation consistency, estimator uncertainty, feature quality, and inertial plausibility. If the fallback loses integrity, the UAV transitions to a map-referenced visual recovery layer that combines altitude-constrained Google Earth tile selection, deep cross-view retrieval, geometric verification, and visual SLAM. The experiments used controlled navigation-measurement spoofing introduced in the ROS 2 navigation path rather than radiated RF spoofing. In the replay-based detector analysis, the complete detector achieved an AUC of 0.984, a detection probability of 0.963, and a mean gradual-attack detection latency of 2.25 s (standard deviation 0.68 s). These descriptive results were obtained from repeated replay instances derived from 20 source missions. Under sequential GNSS and LiDAR–inertial degradation, the proposed integrity manager achieves 95% recovery success in the evaluated campaign, reduces the full sequential-mission 95th-percentile horizontal position error from 5.31 m to 2.31 m relative to hard switching, and obtains an accepted visual fix in 1.92 s (standard deviation 0.67 s). End-to-end horizontal localization RMSE is 1.39 m, while bounded state reconciliation reduces the peak commanded-state jump by 89.1% and post-recovery cross-track RMSE by 71.4%. These results support explicit integrity monitoring and controlled transitions between navigation sources under sequential sensor degradation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alja’afreh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: