Manual road inspections lack sufficient 3D geometric hazard data because of limited coverage and sampling frequency. This paper develops a hazard-oriented safety assessment framework integrating UAV LiDAR reconstruction, PointNet++ point-cloud segmentation, geometric hazard indicators, and traffic-mechanism analysis. Instead of merely extracting road objects, the framework converts segmented scenes into measurable metrics (lane width compression ratio, encroachment ratio, and marking degradation) and couples them with artificial-potential-field trajectory analysis, Lighthill–Whitham–Richards (LWR) traffic-wave theory, and lateral trajectory entropy. Validation with ground control points yielded a planar root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.055 m and an elevation RMSE of 0.025 m for the processed survey scenes. The five displayed class-level intersection over union (IoU) values yield an arithmetic mean of 87.88%, reported as 87.9% after rounding. The geometric hazard cases and traffic outputs are presented as analytical scenarios and sensitivity results; they are not claims of newly observed vehicle trajectories or lane-level field counts. The framework provides an interpretable basis for road maintenance, construction-zone management, and hazard early warning, while future deployment requires independent multi-site and trajectory-based validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ren et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: