Digital-image protection often requires two safeguards at once: the content must remain unintelligible to an unauthorized reader, and the communication itself should not be conspicuous. We introduce AQI-HNS, an encryption-first framework that couples a reversible four-dimensional fractional-map cipher with a security-aware neural hiding channel. Session material is derived from a uniformly generated 256-bit master key and a public 96-bit nonce through HKDF-HMAC-SHA3-512. The encryption stage combines stable chaotic permutation, pre- and post-whitening, and a six-round SHAKE256 wide-block Feistel transformation. Evaluation on 100 Kodak and category-balanced USC-SIPI images at 256 × 256 RGB resolution produced byte-exact decryption in every case. Mean ciphertext entropy was 7.9991 bits per byte, adjacent-byte correlations were close to zero, mean fixed-session NPCR was 99.6098%, and mean UACI was 33.4599%. Across 559 one-byte plaintext perturbations, mean NPCR was 99.6094% and mean UACI was 33.4616%. A coarse timing-dependence screen produced maximum absolute Spearman correlations of 0.0905 for encryption and 0.2206 for decryption; these are empirical diagnostics rather than security proofs. The hiding stage uses attention-guided residual embedding, straight-through 8-bit quantization, independent steganalysis, and a multi-scale blind decoder. All neural development and checkpoint selection were confined to DIV2K. At 0.25 bits per pixel, the selected internal checkpoint achieved a mean BER of 0.0190, a P95 BER of 0.0798, and a mean PSNR of 37.35 dB. Frozen external evaluation yielded a mean BER of 0.0625 on 500 COCO images and 0.0597 on 500 ImageNet validation images, confirming a cross-domain recovery weakness. Two learned residual-domain detectors trained only on DIV2K transferred strongly: SRNet AUCs were 0.9967 internally, 0.9910 on COCO, and 0.9988 on ImageNet, while XuNet-style AUCs were 0.9891, 0.9458, and 0.9775, respectively. Finally, a 196,608-byte v6 ciphertext was transported across 385 covers at 0.25 bpp; the recovered ciphertext BER was 0.0284, only 2 of 385 blocks were exact, and the hash/integrity checks failed. The present uncoded neural channel therefore does not provide reliable byte-exact ciphertext transport, and the learned-steganalysis results rule out any claim of undetectability under the tested detectors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: