Why the study?
Evidence on cardiovascular outcomes of triglyceride-targeting lipid-lowering therapies such as fibrates and niacin in patients with CKD remains limited, prompting guideline recommendations for further investigation.
Does de novo fibrate or niacin therapy reduce MACE compared to statin therapy in patients with incident CKD?
Cohort (n=46,904)
Yes
Does de novo fibrate or niacin therapy reduce MACE compared to statin therapy in patients with incident CKD?
Hazard Ratio: 0.93 (95% CI 0.86–0.99)
p-value: p=0.03
In patients with non-dialysis CKD, initiation of fibrate therapy was associated with a lower risk of MACE compared to statin therapy, largely driven by a reduction in congestive heart failure.
Introduction In patients with CKD, atherogenic lipid profiles, characterized by hypertriglyceridemia and impaired high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) metabolism, contribute to adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. Since evidence on CVD outcomes of triglyceride-targeting lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), such as fibrates and niacin, remains limited, kidney disease guidelines recommend further investigation. Methods We designed this retrospective cohort study using a target trial emulation framework and leveraged data from a nationwide cohort of 3,562,882 US Veterans to identify 46,904 incident CKD patients initiating de novo fibrate, niacin, or statin therapy. We compared the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE] (composite of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, congestive heart failure, or all-cause death) using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline covariates during follow-up of up to 10 years. Results 16,191 patients (event rate, 79.21 [95% CI: 78.0, 80.43] per 1000 person-years) experienced MACE after a median follow-up of 3.70 years. The risk of MACE was significantly lower (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.86, 0.99]; p=0.03) in de novo fibrate users compared to statin users. Niacin users, however, did not have a significantly different risk of MACE (1.03 [0.95, 1.12], p=0.42) than statin users. The result was largely attributable to the association between fibrate use and CHF: a statistically significant 13% lower hazard (0.87 [0.78, 0.96]; p=0.005) compared with statin use. Conclusion In this large nationwide cohort of patients with non-kidney replacement therapy-dependent CKD, de novo fibrate use, but not niacin use, was associated with a lower risk of MACE than de novo statin use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (n=46,904). Fibrate therapy vs. Statin therapy was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, congestive heart failure, or all-cause death) (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-0.99, p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: