Transverse-momentum [Formula: see text] spectra of identified-hadrons are a powerful and precise phenomenological tool to study the collision-energy, centrality, and particle-species dependence of the matter created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. We report a systematic study of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] production in Au+Au collisions as a function of the RHIC Beam Energy Scan (BES) range of [Formula: see text] GeV. The component inverse-slope parameters (effective temperature-like) [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], the fractional contribution [Formula: see text], the weighted effective temperature-like parameter [Formula: see text], the mean transverse momentum [Formula: see text], the model-derived source-temperature parameter [Formula: see text], and the free normalization parameter [Formula: see text] are extracted and/or calculated within a two-component standard distribution, together with the fit-quality measure [Formula: see text]. The results are presented according to centrality, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. For the particle species available, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] drop from central to peripheral collisions and rise with [Formula: see text], indicating systematic spectral softening towards the smaller collision systems. Saturation-like behavior is observed as a descriptive pattern in both the energy scan and the centrality scan: from an energy of about [Formula: see text] GeV and upwards, the growth of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] weakens, and the centrality interval, where the parameters are nearly saturated, moves towards more peripheral collisions as the energy of the collisions increases. The extracted parameters exhibit a clear mass ordering at fixed energy and centrality with proton/antiproton values larger than kaon values that in turn are larger than pion values. The contribution is the combined energy-centrality systematics of spectral hardness, rather than a new thermodynamic interpretation of the fitted parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badshah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: