Play-based curricula are often celebrated as child-centered and liberatory, yet this article argues that play is never neutral in a schooling system where anti-Blackness structures everyday life. Drawing on BlackCrit, Black PlayCrit theories and pro-Black pedagogies, I trace how teacher- and child-perpetrated anti-Black violence surfaces in constructive and sociodramatic play in a Texas public prekindergarten where university preservice teacher interns complete embedded field hours. In this setting—devoid of Black teachers and shaped by state-sanctioned, anti-critical political activism—our use of multicultural and pro-Black texts risks becoming a form of tokenism, producing more hazards than hopeful encounters. Through analysis of school encounters around play, I illustrate racist literacies in “play for all” assumptions and the joy that emerges when Black children author play-based literacy practices that are intern led. I also interrogate my role as a white teacher educator whose collaboration with the school is nascent and potentially a tokenistic violence. The article concludes that play-based curricula must be intentionally grounded in pro-Black, antiracist commitments—rather than laissez-faire play-based curricula harboring claims of neutrality—if early care and education classrooms have any hope of become sites of repair, and resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timothy A. Kinard (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: