Background: Identifying individuals with symptoms or disability informs optimal chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. We evaluated an algorithm incorporating questionnaires (modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] and COPD Assessment Test [CAT]) and standardized incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to identify people with symptoms/disability in COPD. Methods: Analysis of 304 people (36% women) with spirometry-defined COPD aged 42–89 years in the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease study. The 3-step algorithm categorized people as having symptoms/disability if meeting any of: step 1) CAT-total≥10, mMRC≥2 or CAT breathlessness [CAT-B] item≥3; and/or step 2) abnormally high exertional breathlessness intensity (>upper limit of normal by peak exercise); and/or step 3) abnormally low exercise capacity (peak power output Results: A CAT-B≥3 could replace mMRC≥2 with high accuracy (80%) and similar performance in the algorithm. Step 1 classified 64% as asymptomatic , of whom 13% and 27% were reclassified as having symptoms/disability by having abnormally high breathlessness (step 2), or abnormally low exercise capacity (step 3), respectively. People categorized by the algorithm as having symptoms/disability versus not had worse physiological impairments, increased risks of moderate/severe exacerbations ([hazard ratio] 2.60; [95% confidence interval] 1.96–3.47), and tended to have increased all-cause mortality (2.06; 0.93–4.59). Conclusions: In COPD, a stepwise algorithm using CAT and standardized CPET improves identification of adults with symptoms or disability with worse health outcomes and more treatable traits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekström et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: