Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of a virtually delivered, individual, cognitive rehabilitation protocol called Symptom-Targeted Rehabilitation for Cognitive Complaints after Concussion (STAR-C) for Canadian Armed Forces and Royal Canadian Mounted Police Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted comparing STAR-C to provision of self-management educational materials for mTBI. STAR-C was delivered by a speech-language pathologist or occupational therapist. Outcomes were recruitment numbers and participant and clinician ratings on a standard measure of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of intervention. Results: Of 136 veterans who contacted the study coordinator, 56 were eligible and were randomized to either STAR-C (n = 28) or educational materials (Control group, n = 28). Of the 19 active group participants who completed all post-treatment measures, 17 gave high ratings of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Clinicians gave the intervention high ratings of appropriateness and feasibility for the active participants who completed the STAR-C treatment. The 20 control group participants gave a wider range of scores for the educational materials. Discussion: STAR-C was rated as acceptable, appropriate, and feasible by both participants who completed the study and clinicians, with significantly higher participant ratings for STAR-C versus control. There were significant challenges in recruitment, however, raising questions about feasibility and whether awareness-raising efforts might be needed prior to studying treatment efficacy and effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turkstra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: