Wall adhesion in low-temperature, high-water-cut oil–water pipe flow is a dynamic multiphase interfacial process jointly governed by oil-phase retention, interfacial deformation, and hydrodynamic removal by the continuous water phase. However, the relationship between local morphological evolution and the global hydraulic response remains unclear. In this study, pressure-drop, temperature, and flow rate measurements were combined with end point weighing and wall visualization to investigate wall adhesion at water cuts of 90%, 93%, and 97% and mixture superficial velocities of 0.16, 0.32, and 0.48 m s−1. The global hydraulic response exhibited three stages: rapid growth, decelerated development, and quasi-steady fluctuation. Even after the equivalent adhesion thickness entered the quasi-steady stage, the wall-adhered oil phase continued to undergo streamwise elongation, necking, edge recession, and local rearrangement. This finding indicates that hydraulic quasi-steadiness does not correspond to a static local morphology, but instead reflects an approximate balance between continued oil-phase retention and hydrodynamic removal. Based on these observations, a retention–removal kinetic model was developed, in which wall adhesion was described as the dynamic outcome of competition between continued oil-phase retention and hydrodynamic removal. The model achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.971, a root mean square error of 0.193 mm, and a mean absolute error of 0.148 mm. Within the investigated parameter range, the model satisfactorily described the dynamic evolution of wall adhesion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: