This paper examines the impact of the large structural shocks—automation and import competition—on voter turnout during US federal elections from 2000 to 2016. Although the negative income effect of both shocks is comparable, we find that political participation decreases significantly in counties more exposed to industrial robots. In contrast, exposure to rising import competition does not reduce voter turnout and may even boost it in House elections. A survey experiment reveals that divergent beliefs about the effectiveness of government intervention drive this contrast. Our study highlights the role of beliefs in shaping consequences of structural shocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chugunova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: