PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ambulatory surgery is expanding rapidly in an aging, comorbid population, yet delirium prevention strategies remain designed for the inpatient setting. This review provides a mechanistic and pragmatic framework for postoperative delirium (POD) in ambulatory patients and proposes an operational algorithm for its diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prevention, and management. RECENT FINDINGS: POD is found in approximately 17.7% of cases following noncardiac procedures overall, but appears markedly less frequent in the ambulatory setting (<2%), potentially reflecting less invasive procedures, the widespread use of regional anesthesia, and limited exposure to hospital-related precipitating factors. This apparent low frequency creates a detection gap: once the patient is home, screening depends on caregivers. The Family Confusion Assessment Method shows good agreement with clinician-rated Confusion Assessment Method and, when embedded in structured telephone or telehealth follow-up, extends surveillance to postoperative day 30. Preventive levers now supported by data include multimodal prehabilitation (11.7-8.2%), individualized blood pressure targets, electroencephalography-guided depth of anesthesia, and family-delivered multicomponent programs (t-HELP; 19.4-2.6%). Neuronal-injury biomarkers, particularly phosphorylated Tau181 (pTau181), argue for a pathway shared with neurodegeneration. SUMMARY: POD predominantly affects patients over 65 years of age and carries increased morbidity, mortality, and long-term cognitive decline; more than 30% of cases are preventable. In ambulatory care, the challenge is not case volume but case detection: preoperative risk stratification supported by standardized protocols for multidisciplinary collection of clinical history from relatives, systematic exclusion of reversible organic causes, and caregiver-based screening after discharge. Rather than a low-risk setting by default, the ambulatory pathway should be regarded as an active preventive strategy for frail older patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khoury et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: