Key result
Chemical-first cardioversion cuts 4-hour discharges by ~52% vs electrical-first.
Why the study?
There are no comparative effectiveness data to guide clinicians on chemical-first versus electrical-first cardioversion strategies in uncomplicated AF patients of less than 48 hours duration.
RCT (n=84)
1:1
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 32% vs 67%
p-value: p=0.001
May inform ED AF cardioversion choice; leaves open optimal chemical- vs electrical-first strategy.
BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) patients with uncomplicated atrial fibrillation (AF) of less than 48 hours may be safely managed with rhythm control. Although both chemical-first and electrical-first strategies have been advocated, there are no comparative effectiveness data to guide clinicians. METHODS: score of 0 or 1 were randomized using concealed allocation in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following strategies: 1) chemical cardioversion with procainamide infusion, followed by electrical countershock if unsuccessful; or 2) electrical cardioversion, followed by procainamide infusion if unsuccessful. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged within 4 hours of arrival. Secondary outcomes included ED length-of-stay (LOS); prespecified ED-based adverse events; and 30-day ED revisits, hospitalizations, strokes, deaths, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: scores. All patients were discharged home, with 83 (99%) in sinus rhythm. In the chemical-first group, 13 of 41 patients (32%) were discharged within 4 hours compared to 29 of 43 patients (67%) in the electrical-first group (p = 0.001). In the chemical-first group, the median ED LOS was 5.1 hours (interquartile range [IQR] = 3.5 to 5.9 hours) compared to 3.5 hours (IQR = 2.4 to 4.6 hours) in the electrical-first group, for a median difference of 1.2 hours (95% confidence interval = 0.4 to 2.0 hours, p < 0.001). No patients experienced stroke or death. All other outcomes, including adverse events, ED revisits, and QoL, were similar. CONCLUSION: In uncomplicated ED AF patients managed with rhythm control, chemical-first and electrical-first strategies both appear to be successful and well tolerated; however, an electrical-first strategy results in a significantly shorter ED LOS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scheuermeyer et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Uncomplicated Acute Atrial Fibrillation (n=84). Chemical-first cardioversion vs. Electrical-first cardioversion was evaluated on Proportion of patients discharged within 4 hours of arrival (p=0.001). A chemical-first cardioversion strategy resulted in a lower proportion of patients discharged within 4 hours compared to an electrical-first strategy (32% vs 67%, P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: