Key result
Higher pulse pressure is linked to ~9% higher diabetic retinopathy odds per 10 mmHg.
Why the study?
The relationship between pulse pressure and the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus was not well established.
Is elevated pulse pressure associated with a higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,001)
Yes
Is elevated pulse pressure associated with a higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Higher pulse pressure is independently and linearly associated with increased odds of prevalent diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes, highlighting its potential as a simple clinical marker for microvascular risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher pulse pressure was associated with retinopathy in type 2 diabetes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between pulse pressure (PP) and the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods This research is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study conducted between April 2002 and November 2004, which included 2,001 adults with diabetes mellitus (859 men and 1,142 women, mean age 64.1 ± 11.3 years) recruited from outpatient clinics in southern Taiwan. Comprehensive demographic and clinical data were collected, defining pulse pressure as the difference between systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measured in mmHg. The association between PP and DR was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders, and a generalized additive model (GAM) was utilized to explore non-linear relationships. Results Elevated PP levels were consistently associated with higher odds of prevalent DR across progressively adjusted models. When PP was modeled per 10-mmHg increment, the association remained significant in Model 1 (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.09–1.23; P < 0.0001), Model 2 (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.06–1.21; P = 0.0002), and Model 3 (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02–1.17; P = 0.0136). When analyzed by tertiles, the middle tertile (50–61 mmHg) showed significant associations in the unadjusted model (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.04–1.66; P = 0.0218) that diminished upon full adjustment (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.92–1.52; P = 0.1828). In contrast, the high tertile (62–136 mmHg) maintained a significant association after adjustments (Model 1: OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.44–2.29; P < 0.0001; Model 3: OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.13–1.91; P = 0.0039). Conclusions This study indicates higher PP was associated with higher odds of prevalent DR in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=2,001). Pulse pressure vs. Lower pulse pressure was evaluated on Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17, p=0.0136). Higher pulse pressure was independently associated with higher odds of prevalent diabetic retinopathy in adults with type 2 diabetes, with a 9% increase in odds per 10-mmHg increment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: