Key result
Novel risk model accurately identifies demoralization syndrome in CHF with ~0.84 AUC.
Why the study?
Associated factors for demoralization syndrome in patients with chronic heart failure and a risk prediction model for early identification were not established.
Cross-Sectional (n=331)
Yes
A predictive model incorporating exercise frequency, NYHA class, social support, symptom burden, and blood stasis constitution can effectively identify chronic heart failure patients at high risk for demoralization syndrome.
May support early demoralization screening in CHF; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Objective To investigate the associated factors for demoralization syndrome in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and to develop a risk prediction model that facilitates early identification of high-risk individuals. Methods A total of 331 patients with CHF were recruited from two hospitals in Anhui Province, China, between March 2025 and February 2026 using convenience sampling. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and validated scales were used to assess demoralization, social support, and symptom burden. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed—specifically, univariate analysis was employed to screen for associated factors, while multivariable regression was applied to identify independent predictors and construct the prediction model. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Results Demoralization syndrome was identified in 57.7% of patients. In the univariate analyses, several variables emerged as associated factors. In the multivariable model, exercise frequency, NYHA functional class, SSRS score, KCCQ score, and blood stasis constitution were identified as independent predictors and were incorporated into the final prediction model. The AUC was 0.835 (95% CI: 0.783–0.886) in the training set and 0.822 (95% CI: 0.735–0.909), in the validation set. The model showed good calibration and favorable clinical net benefit. Conclusion Exercise frequency, NYHA functional class, social support, symptom burden, and blood stasis constitution are independent predictors of demoralization syndrome in patients with CHF. The proposed prediction model demonstrated robust discrimination and calibration in internal validation, suggesting its potential as a preliminary auxiliary reference for risk awareness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic heart failure (n=331). Risk prediction model (exercise, NYHA class, SSRS, KCCQ, blood stasis constitution) was evaluated on Model discrimination (Area Under the Curve) for demoralization syndrome in the training set (AUC 0.835, 95% CI 0.783-0.886). A prediction model using exercise frequency, NYHA class, social support, symptom burden, and blood stasis constitution accurately identified demoralization syndrome in CHF patients (AUC 0.835).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: