Why the study?
Optimal long-term antithrombotic therapy for patients with chronic coronary disease on oral anticoagulation, particularly with atrial fibrillation, remains uncertain due to bleeding risks and ischemic protection concerns.
Does OAC monotherapy reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic events compared to OAC plus antiplatelet therapy in patients with chronic coronary disease on long-term anticoagulation?
Does OAC monotherapy reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic events compared to OAC plus antiplatelet therapy in patients with chronic coronary disease on long-term anticoagulation?
OAC monotherapy should be the default long-term maintenance therapy for most patients with chronic coronary disease requiring anticoagulation, reserving antiplatelets for individualized high-ischemic/low-bleeding-risk scenarios.
INTRODUCTION: Chronic coronary disease (CCD) commonly coexists with long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC), particularly for atrial fibrillation (AF). Combination antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding, whereas ischemic protection with OAC alone remains a concern. We critically appraised contemporary evidence and guidelines to define optimal long-term maintenance therapy. METHODS: We synthesized WOEST, PIONEER AF-PCI, RE-DUAL PCI, AUGUSTUS, AFIRE, OAC-ALONE, PRAEDO-AF, EPIC-CAD, AQUATIC, and meta-analyses. Because foundational trials included recent ACS/PCI populations, evidence was analyzed as early/recent ACS or PCI (≤1 year) and late/stable CAD (>1 year post-PCI or non-revascularized CCD). Designs, populations, ischemic, bleeding, and mortality outcomes were systematically compared within the 2023 ACC/AHA CCD and AF guidelines. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Early trials supported aspirin withdrawal and DOAC plus single P2Y12 inhibition after PCI. Later trials showed full-dose OAC monotherapy was noninferior to OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy beyond 6-12 months or in stable non-revascularized CCD for preventing myocardial infarction, stroke, and systemic embolism, while reducing major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and, sometimes, mortality. Meta-analysis showed fewer cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding events without excess ischemia. CONCLUSION: OAC monotherapy should be the default for most patients, reserving antiplatelets for individualized high-ischemic/low-bleeding-risk scenarios, while recognizing predominantly East Asian and limited European evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reddy et al. (2026) conducted a review in Chronic coronary disease (CCD) on long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). OAC monotherapy vs. OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Myocardial infarction, stroke, and systemic embolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: