This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with delayed diagnosis contributing to poor outcomes in resource-limited regions. Protein Induced by Vitamin K Absence-II (PIVKA-II), a non-functional prothrombin variant, has emerged as a promising biomarker for HCC detection and risk stratification. This study investigates serum PIVKA-II levels in a regional cohort from Balochistan, Pakistan, to evaluate its diagnostic performance and demographic associations. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 34 patients undergoing liver disease evaluation. Serum PIVKA-II concentrations were measured using Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA) and stratified into three diagnostic categories: Healthy (≤43 mAU/mL), Borderline (44–147 mAU/mL), and HCC (≥148 mAU/mL). Age and gender distributions were analyzed to identify epidemiological trends. Results: Of the 34 participants (25 males, 9 females; age range: 38–75 years), 19 (55.9%) exhibited PIVKA-II levels consistent with HCC, 2 (5.9%) were borderline, and 13 (38.2%) fell within the healthy range. HCC-range elevations were most frequent in males aged 60–69 years. Notably, one male aged 30–39 presented with an extreme elevation (>30,000 mAU/mL), suggesting possible early-onset or aggressive disease. Overall, 74% of HCC-range cases were male, reinforcing known gender disparities in HCC prevalence. Conclusion: PIVKA-II demonstrates strong diagnostic utility for HCC in this underserved population, with clear age and gender correlations. Its integration into routine screening protocols may enhance early detection, particularly in high-risk male cohorts. Further multicenter studies incorporating AFP and molecular profiling are warranted to validate dual-marker strategies and optimize diagnostic algorithms for liver malignancies in low-resource settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: