Key result
Higher self-efficacy links strongly to better self-management in hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Hypertensive patients require good and sustainable self-care to prevent complications, and the role of self-efficacy in predicting self-management needed evaluation.
Does self-efficacy predict self-management in hypertensive patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=35)
No
Does self-efficacy predict self-management in hypertensive patients?
Effect estimate: correlation coefficient 0.777
p-value: p=<0.001
High self-efficacy is a strong predictor of better self-management behaviors among hypertensive patients.
May guide self-management counseling in hypertension; leaves open causal effects pending prospective trials.
Hypertension as a chronic disease with a major sign of increased blood pressure is becoming a problem globally. Increased blood pressure can be the cause of various other chronic diseases such as coronary artery disease and stroke. As an effort to prevent these complications, hypertensive patients need good and sustainable self-care. Self-efficacy is one of the factors that contribute to good self-care. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of self-efficacy on self-management in hypertensive patients. This study was conducted in Palembang with 35 respondents with hypertension aged >17 years. Data was taken through self-efficacy and self-management questionnaires that have been declared valid and reliable. Most 35 respondents have elementary and high-school education backgrounds, high self-efficacy, and moderate self-management. Self-efficacy strongly predicts self-management, although age and educational background do not significantly influence it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frisca et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=35). Self-efficacy was evaluated on Self-management (correlation coefficient 0.777, p=<0.001). High self-efficacy strongly and positively correlated with better self-management among hypertensive patients (correlation coefficient 0.777, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: