Key result
Staffing levels, experience, and workload are associated with pre-anesthesia assessment rates in cardiovascular surgery.
Why the study?
Pre-anesthesia assessment is important for surgical patients with cardiovascular disorders, but it is often underperformed and not promptly recorded due to time constraints.
Cross-Sectional (n=254)
Adequate staffing, manageable workload, and longer clinical experience significantly improve the likelihood of anesthesiologists conducting proper pre-anesthesia assessments in surgical patients with cardiovascular disorders.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low pre-anesthesia assessment rates signal workflow barriers; leaves open targeted strategies to improve evaluation in cardiovascular surgical patients.
Pre-anesthesia assessment is very important in ensuring the success of surgical procedures, especially in cases involving comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disorders. Pre-anesthesia assessment is often only performed by 19.5% of anesthesiologists, and the results are not recorded immediately after the procedure in the patient's medical records due to time constraints. This study aims to determine the factors that influence anesthesiologists in conducting pre-anesthesia assessments on surgical patients with cardiovascular disorders. The research design used was a correlational analytical study with a cross-sectional approach. The population was anesthetists in Indonesia, and the sample was selected using purposive sampling. Univariate analysis was performed by determining the frequency distribution and percentage of general characteristics of respondents, while bivariate analysis with chi-square was performed to determine the relationship between factors affecting anesthetists in conducting pre-anesthesia assessment on surgical patients with cardiovascular disorders. The sample size in this study was 245 respondents. The results of the study showed that factors associated with the implementation of pre-anesthesia assessment in surgical patients with cardiovascular disorders were length of service (p 0.020), workload (p 0.018), and number of anesthesiologists (p 0.009).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parwati et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Pre-anesthesia assessment practices for surgical patients with cardiovascular disorders (n=254). Workplace and experience factors (number of anesthesiologists, length of service, workload) was evaluated on Level of pre-anesthesia assessment implementation (p=0.009). The number of anesthesiologists, length of service, and workload were associated with the implementation of pre-anesthesia assessments.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: