Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) vs. multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) targeted biopsy (TPBx) in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa: Grade Group ≥2). Patients and Methods: From January 2021 to January 2022, 45 patients (median age: 67 years) with negative digital rectal examination underwent transperineal prostate biopsy for abnormal PSA values (median 7.3 ng/ml). Before prostate biopsy, all patients underwent mpMRI and 68Ga-PET/CT examinations, which included mpMRI (PI-RADS version 2 ≥3), and 68Ga-PET/CT index lesions suspicious for cancer (SUVmax ≥5 g/ml) underwent cognitive targeted cores (mpMRI-TPBx and PSMA-TPBx: four cores) combined with extended systematic prostate biopsy (eSPBx: median 18 cores). The procedure was performed transperineally using a tru-cut 18-gauge needle under sedation and antibiotic prophylaxis. Results: PCa was found in 29/45 (64.4%) men; in detail, 22/45 (48.9%) were csPCa. 68Ga-PSMA-TPBx vs. mpMRI-TPBx vs. eSPBx missed one (4.5%) vs. four (18.1%) vs. seven (31.8%) csPCa, respectively; mpMRI-TPBx vs. 68Ga-PSMA-TPBx for csPCa showed a diagnostic accuracy of 73.7 vs. 77.5%. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT TPBx demonstrated good accuracy in the diagnosis of csPCa, which was not inferior to mpMRI-TPBx (77.5 vs. 73.7%), improving the detection rate for cancer in systematic biopsy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pepe et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: