Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE Few evidence-based social cognitive interventions are available to autistic youth as they navigate their complex, socially-demanding teenage years. Building from pilot research using neuroplasticity-based targeted cognitive-training (NB-TCT), we developed CICADAS (Care Improving Cognition for ADolescents on the Autism Spectrum), a digital application designed to prime the brain for socio-affective learning. In a randomized active-controlled trial with 3 comparison arms, we evaluated CICADAS as a stand-alone program and as an augmentation to evidence-based PEERS (Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relationship Skills). METHOD Recruiting from clinics delivering PEERS, we enrolled sixty-two adolescents (11-18 years) with confirmed autism. Individuals scheduled to start PEERS were block-randomized into PEERS+CICADAS (N=22) and PEERS+Active Control (N=21) groups. A third comparison group (N=19) comprised individuals who would use the app as a stand-alone intervention (CICADAS-Only). In addition to in-app performance metrics, we collected data from social, behavioral, and cognitive assessments (self-report/parent-report measures) at Pre-Intervention (Baseline), Post-Intervention (16-weeks), and Follow-Up (32-weeks) sessions. RESULTS We found significant effects of GROUP, TIME, and GROUP X TIME on multiple measures collected longitudinally. For example, on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, PEERS+CICADAS participants showed significant Psychosocial Health improvements ( F= 6.862, p=.002 ) over the study timeline compared to trend-level gains in the CICADAS-Only ( F= 2.150, p= .122) and PEERS+Active Control ( F= 1.917, p= .153) groups. While all participants improved from baseline on the Social Responsiveness Scale, 2nd Edition ( F= 11.038, p<.001 ), only the PEERS+CICADAS group gained significantly ( F= 3.786, p= .026) on the Social Cognition subscale across all three time-points. CONCLUSION Our data demonstrates the potential of CICADAS as a stand-alone program and suggests that engaging with the adaptive app (versus static Active Control) conferred an additional advantage to autistic teens participating in PEERS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: