This study investigates the potential of high-speed nanoindentation in collaboration with data analytics and phase volume fractions to achieve micromechanical characterization of heterogeneous rocks. Although micromechanical characterization can be performed using mechanical testing alone, integrating chemical analysis—such as elemental mapping techniques—provides essential phase identification. This enables more accurate interpretation of phase-specific mechanical properties. However, incorporating chemical analysis increases the complexity of the process. Hence, this study proposes data-driven micromechanical characterization and mapping of heterogeneous rocks based primarily on mechanical data and limited dependence on chemical analysis. In this study, Mancos shale rock is analyzed using high-speed nanoindentation with high spatial resolution to determine the mechanical properties at the microscale. Subsequently, a suite of unsupervised statistical learning techniques, such as uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) with k -means clustering, Gaussian mixture model (GMM), Dirichlet process mixture model (DPMM), and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), are applied to the nanoindentation data. Additionally, an automated image processing and segmentation technique was developed and tested. The results from each technique have been systematically compared against the conventional chemomechanical approach using two metrics: weighted error, which evaluates how well cluster sizes match actual phase sizes, and spatial error, which quantifies the accuracy of mineral phase assignment at each indentation point. Based on the results, UMAP with k -means clustering is the most appropriate technique (with relatively low weighted and spatial errors of 13.40% and 30.40% for Test 2 grid and 26.74% and 49.20% for Test 3 grid) for micromechanical characterization and mapping of heterogeneous rocks, whereas DBSCAN, DPMM, and image segmentation techniques are more suitable as secondary approaches for cross-checking results from UMAP with k -means. Moreover, a comparison of the application of scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) image volume fractions and chemomechanical grid volume fractions for the phase volume fractions has been performed to derive the influence of chemical analysis on the results. This study demonstrates the capability of high-speed nanoindentation combined with machine learning techniques for micromechanical characterization with reduced analytical complexity and improved workflow efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: