Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) poses a substantial therapeutic challenge, particularly in culture-negative cases. The efficacy of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for PJI after UKA remains inadequately defined. This study evaluated DAIR supplemented by postoperative catheter-based intra-articular antibiotic infusion and compared outcomes between culture-positive and culture-negative patients. Methods In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 21 patients with PJI after UKA who met the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria were treated with DAIR, including radical debridement, povidone-iodine lavage, and postoperative catheter-based intra-articular antibiotic infusion. The primary outcome was eradication success at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included reoperation, functional recovery, inflammatory-marker normalization, and antibiotic-related complications. Results At a mean follow-up of 25 months, the overall infection eradication rate was 85.7%, with no significant difference between culture-positive (83.3%) and culture-negative (88.9%) groups. Functional scores improved substantially and comparably between groups. However, culture-negative patients experienced significantly longer hospital stays (18.2 vs 13.7 days, P = .005), higher treatment costs ( P = .004), and increased incidence of renal injury (77.8% vs 25.0%, P = .03). Conclusions In this exploratory single-center cohort, DAIR supplemented by catheter-based intra-articular antibiotic infusion demonstrated encouraging mid-term infection control in carefully selected patients with UKA-PJI. Comparable infection-control and functional outcomes were observed between culture-positive and culture-negative cases; however, the limited sample size precludes definitive conclusions regarding equivalence between groups. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level III.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: