Objective: To examine the associations of salivary cortisol with the reproductive hormone profiles and with sperm chromatin maturity across semen-quality phenotypes in infertile men. Study Design: Cross-sectional studyPlace and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Andrology Clinic, Najaf Iraq from 1st September 2025 to 30th November 2025. Methods: One hundred infertile men were classified by WHO criteria into normozoospermia, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia were enrolled. Salivary cortisol, serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, total testosterone, prolactin and estradiol, and sperm chromatin maturity (assessed byaniline blue staining) were measured. Results: Salivary cortisol was inversely associated with follicle-stimulating hormone (rho = -0.28, p=0.005; false discovery rate q=0.026; 95% CI -0.45 to -0.09) and this association remained independent in multivariableregression (standardized beta = -0.20, p=0.029). Cortisol showed a weaker positive association with estradiol (rho = +0.22, p=0.029) that did not survive false discovery rate correction, and no significant association with luteinizing hormone, testosterone or prolactin. Follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone differed across phenotypes (p<0.001), being highest in normozoospermia. Sperm chromatin immaturity was low (median 6% aniline-blue- positive), did not differ across phenotypes (p=0.60), and was not associated with cortisol or the endocrine profile, apart from a weak correlation with prolactin (rho = +0.28, p=0.011). Conclusion: In infertile men, higher salivary cortisol is independently associated with lower follicle-stimulating hormone, consistent with an inhibitory influence of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity on the gonadotropic axis. Sperm chromatin maturity was largely preserved and unrelated to stress or the endocrine profile.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radeef et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: