Leaf area index (LAI) is a key descriptor of forest canopy structure, yet its reliable estimation in mountainous coniferous forests is hindered by topographic heterogeneity, complex stand structure and canopy-background mixing. We developed an allometry-informed Sentinel-2 framework for plot-scale LAI estimation in the Altai Mountains using field measurements from 47 plots. The framework incorporated DBH 2 × TH, where DBH is diameter at breast height and TH is tree height, as a structural proxy for canopy development. This term was combined with Sentinel-2 vegetation indices (VIs) and grey-level co-occurrence matrix texture features (TFs). Relevance ranking and redundancy filtering retained 25 VIs and 25 TFs from initial pools of 67 and 40 variables, respectively. GOSAVI combined with blue-band homogeneity was the highest-ranked inner-loop predictor combination. Under repeated nested cross-validation, the complete VI–TF modelling procedure achieved a pooled outer-loop R 2 of 0.73, an RMSE of 0.31 and an MAE of 0.25. By comparison, the structural-only baseline yielded an R 2 of 0.45, an RMSE of 0.44 and an MAE of 0.35. Comparisons with six benchmark regression algorithms showed that VI–TF combinations consistently contained useful LAI-related information, although predictive performance varied among algorithms and feature pairs. UAV observations from 12 overlapping plots provided a supplementary high-resolution assessment of cross-resolution consistency. Because these plots were a subset of the main field dataset, the UAV analysis was not considered an independent validation. Within the sampled forest and environmental conditions, integrating allometric structure with Sentinel-2 spectral and textural information improved plot-scale LAI estimation. Further evaluation using independent plots, years, regions and forest types is required to establish the broader transferability of the framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ju et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: