BACKGROUND: Data on carbapenem pre-authorisation in hospitals with a high prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing organisms is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of implementing a carbapenem pre-authorisation policy on patients admitted to our acute care floors, focusing on appropriateness of use and the clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective observational quasi-experimental study was conducted comparing data from adults with active infections admitted to the acute care floors during the pre-restriction period (December 2021-May 2022) and the post-restriction period (June 2022-December 2023) who were prescribed carbapenems (ertapenem or meropenem). RESULTS: A total of 244 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 131 in the pre-implementation period and 113 in the post-implementation period. The proportion of appropriately indicated carbapenem use was significantly higher in the post-restriction group at 69.9% (79) compared with 55.7% (73) in the pre-restriction group (p=0.025). The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in the post-restriction group at 8 (7.1%) vs 26 (19.8%) in the pre-restriction group (p=0.005). Length of hospital stay was also significantly reduced in the post-restriction group, with a median of 6 days compared with 9 days in the pre-restriction group (p=0.002). Additionally, the 30-day readmission rate was lower in the post-restriction group at 20.4% (23) compared with 32.1% (42) in the pre-restriction group (p=0.043). The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score was the only independent risk factor for mortality (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.3 to 7.9; p = 0.013), while neither the carbapenem used nor the restriction policy demonstrated a significant association with mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite the high prevalence of ESBL-producing organisms, the carbapenem pre-authorisation policy proved effective in optimising their use, particularly with respect to appropriateness and clinical outcomes. Larger studies are warranted to corroborate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nauman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: