This commentary reflects on the process of creating an ethnographic film about CROSSOVERS, an experimental music collective formed by friends and fellow students at Goldsmiths.Motivated by a desire to make a film with and for the collective, the project explores how local music scenes function as fluid, relational networks.The filmmaking process evolved through observational and impressionistic approaches, guided by concepts of intimacy, haptic visuality, and collaborative authorship.Filming CROSSOVERS's monthly performance nights and recording interviews with its founding members and many performers produced an experimental structure that intertwines performer and audience perspectives while questioning hierarchies of representation.The film also investigates the meaning of collectivity, highlighting the group's ethos of volunteerism, non-commercial practice, and alternative social organisation.As the collective later dissolved and re-formed into new artistic configurations, the film now serves as an archival record of an evolving community.Ultimately, this work grapples with the central question of how one can make a film as a collective, and foregrounds shared creativity, shifting spaces, and the ongoing life of experimental sound practices.What matters, whether it is a feature documentary film or a web video, a short doc or an i-doc, a blockbuster or a series of clips to accompany a journal article, is that as an ethnographic work whatever you did with your
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colton Kempf (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: