Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The low-carbon transition of cropland use must reconcile emission reduction with food security in major grain-producing areas. Using panel data for 89 major grain-producing counties in Sichuan Province, China, from 2010 to 2022, this study measures the low-carbon transition performance of cropland use (LCTP-CLU) with a global-benchmark undesirable-output super-efficiency slacks-based measure (GB-US-S-SBM) model. Spatial autocorrelation analysis and a spatial Durbin model are then used to examine spatiotemporal patterns, driving factors, and spillover effects. LCTP-CLU increased overall, with the sample mean rising from 0.558 in 2010 to 0.618 in 2022. Performance was higher in northeastern Sichuan and lower in southwestern Sichuan, and high-value counties became increasingly contiguous by 2022. The cropland area per agricultural worker, multiple-cropping index, and rural economic development significantly improved LCTP-CLU, whereas the agricultural industrial structure reduced it. LCTP-CLU also exhibited significant positive spatial spillovers; cropland area per agricultural worker, multiple-cropping index, and rural economic development generated positive effects in neighboring counties. These findings support differentiated county-level policies and cross-regional coordination to advance low-carbon cropland use while safeguarding grain production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: