Dynamic flexible job shop scheduling (DFJSP) faces compound uncertainty from job arrivals, machine breakdowns, labor volatility, and fluctuating carbon signals, and reactive or expectation-based methods cannot prevent costly tail events. This study proposes a five-stage risk-aware predictive–proactive framework that combines rolling-horizon forecasting, Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) assessment, proactive pre-allocation of time buffers, preventive maintenance, and energy flexibility, risk-adaptive MOEA/D, and real-time control by a graph-attention reinforcement learning (RL) agent. MOEA/D and the agent exchange knowledge bidirectionally: RL trajectories seed the evolutionary search, and non-dominated solutions regularize policy learning. Over 30 independent runs under high compound uncertainty, the framework reduces delay CVaR by 65.4%, carbon emissions by 24.5%, and labor-shortage CVaR by 65.4% relative to NSGA-II, and by 49.3%, 9.8%, and 49.3% relative to single-agent deep RL, the strongest baseline, while keeping online decision latency below one second at the largest scale tested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuo-Feng Huang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: