Breast cancer comprises five intrinsic molecular subtypes with distinct transcriptomic programs, prognoses, and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Yet, accurate subtype discrimination remains limited by boundary-overlap and poor cross-cohort generalisability, while single-target agents often fail against pathway redundancy and acquired resistance. We developed an integrated computational framework linking transcriptomic-classification, explainable target prioritisation, and multi-target natural-product discovery. Three transcriptomic cohorts (METABRIC-BRCA-2016, TCGA-BRCA-2012, and TCGA-BRCA-2018; n = 2512 after quality-control and ComBat-correction) were integrated. Differential-expression analysis and PCA-based feature selection yielded a 50-gene signature that retained more than 90% of the subtype-associated variance. Among the six evaluated classifiers, XGBoost achieved the best performance and generalised to an independent cohort of 3,409 samples (accuracy: 85.70%; ROC-AUC: 0.95–0.99). SHAP-analysis identified 30-candidate genes associated with Basal-like and HER2-enriched subtypes, which were cross-referenced against ChEMBL to retain 11 targets for proteochemometric (PCM) modelling. A hybrid PCM multilayer-perceptron integrating ProtBERT and ChemBERTa embeddings with molecular fingerprints and chemical descriptors achieved a balanced-accuracy of 0.9140 and mean ROC-AUC of 0.9696. Screening of 30,898 NPASS natural products identified 292 pan-active compounds. Independent binding- and safety-prioritisation strategies converged on three leads: NPC139056, NPC196231, and NPC471997. This reproducible pipeline provides computationally prioritised leads for experimental validation in clinically challenging breast cancer subtypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jakkula et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: