Long-term efficacy and toxicity data are needed to inform optimal first-line treatment for individual patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We report long-term outcomes of ibrutinib-venetoclax in older/comorbid patients at 67-month median follow-up of the phase III GLOW study (NCT03462719) and report grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)-free progression-free survival (PFS). Patients were randomized 1:1 to ibrutinib-venetoclax ( n = 106) or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab ( n = 105). Sixty-six-month overall survival (OS) rates were 79.0% and 60.8% for ibrutinib-venetoclax and chlorambucil-obinutuzumab, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46). Ibrutinib-venetoclax reduced the risk of requiring second-line therapy by 77.4% and continued to improve PFS vs chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (66-month rates: 51.7% vs 18.1%, HR 0.27), regardless of IGHV/measurable residual disease (MRD) status. Ibrutinib-venetoclax-treated patients with undetectable MRD at end-of-treatment had better PFS outcomes than those with detectable MRD, especially in patients with unmutated IGHV. Grade 3/4 TEAE-free PFS was 21.4 months longer for ibrutinib-venetoclax vs chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (51.6 vs 30.2 months). Ibrutinib-venetoclax maintains superior OS, superior PFS, reduction in need for second-line treatment, and longer PFS duration without grade 3/4 TEAEs vs chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. Fixed-duration ibrutinib-venetoclax is an effective first-line treatment option for older/comorbid patients with previously untreated CLL, providing durable disease control and preserving future treatment options.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niemann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: