We investigate a question posed by S. Hopkins (OPAC-038) on whether the sign representation maximizes the number of negative entries in the character table of the symmetric group S_n for all sufficiently large n. We present certified exact counterexamples to this extremality conjecture across fifteen values of n, beginning at n = 112 and extending through the complete interval 127 ≤ n ≤ 134. These counterexamples isolate a narrow, structured regime of proportional hooks (n - a, 1^a) with a/n ≈ 0.65. For n ≡ 1 (mod 3), the counterexamples coincide exactly with a shifted hook family η_m = (m + 2, 1²ᵐ⁻¹) ⊢ 3m + 1. To analyze this family, we prove a series of exact structural identities:(1) Even parts of the conjugacy class act as finite differences on a positive subset-sum profile.(2) On odd classes, cycle-deletion reduces the character to an explicit cubic polynomial in small multiplicities, isolating a resonance family that guarantees a large lower bound of negative entries.(3) The character sign can be mapped to an exact phase representation where the signed row bias corresponds to the odd-harmonic content of a canonical complex number. An alignment identity shows that for η_m, the third harmonic of the phase is invariant under variations in both the sign and the number of parts of the partition. Finally, we provide high-precision uniform sampling data up to n = 601 to track the decay rate of the zero density versus the third-harmonic bias, highlighting the role of phase rotation in determining whether these violations persist indefinitely or vanish asymptotically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simon Watts (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: