Modern deepfakes leave forensic traces across audio, visual, and cross-modal channels, yet contemporary detectors are monolithic transformer-based architectures whose post hoc explanations struggle to isolate modality-specific artefacts. We propose a multi-agent system in which five specialised detection agents each target distinct forensic features: facial biometrics and image quality, ECAPA-TDNN speaker embeddings, cross-modal lip-sync, XceptionNet spatial analysis, and FreqNet frequency-domain analysis. Each agent is a self-contained detector with its own perception, decision and explanation. An adaptive orchestrator invokes supplementary agents when first-wave agents disagree; this escalation does not significantly improve in-distribution accuracy but adds forensic evidence, and its rate rises under domain shift. Each agent produces its own modality-appropriate explanation, and a report-generation agent synthesises these into a natural-language forensic summary. On the PolyGlotFake test set, a within-source measurement, the system reaches 99.91% accuracy at τ = 0.35, set on the validation partition, with an AUC-ROC of 1.000. On the public MAVOS-DD benchmark the system detects forged speech, including unseen voice-conversion methods (AUC-ROC 0.79), while per-agent scores locate the gap in video-only forgeries (0.44); there, escalation significantly reduces errors, and one additional agent raises the overall AUC-ROC from 0.58 to 0.74, showing the framework’s ability to ameliorate system weaknesses to unseen forgeries with additional agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barry et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: