Carbon isotope trends of light hydrocarbons in mature to overmature natural gases are commonly evaluated against gas wetness ([C2 + C3]/[C1 + C2 + C3]), yet the geometric effects of component-specific abundance contrasts are often conflated with reaction- or transport-driven fractionation. We develop an abundance-weighted framework for binary mixing that conserves 12C and 13C and relates the bulk mixing fraction x to a component-specific effective coordinate, ωi(x) = x/[x + (1 − x)ρi], where ρi is the abundance ratio of component i in the endmembers. Thus, δ13Ci is linear in ωi but generally nonlinear in x when ρi ≠ 1. Analytical expressions and C1–C3 benchmark simulations show that the “linear interpolation bias” is controlled jointly by isotopic contrast and abundance asymmetry, producing component-specific curvature of δ13Ci isotope vs. wetness trends. Binary mixing of fixed endmembers cannot produce a true rollover in an individual hydrocarbon isotope trajectory, although isotope-contrast metrics may develop local extrema because different components follow different effective mixing coordinates. Reparameterizing the trajectories by wetness can shift and nonlinearly compress or stretch pre-existing features along the horizontal axis, but it cannot create new extrema or change their amplitudes. The proposed framework therefore provides a mass-balance null model for evaluating mixing interpretations and identifying cases that require evolving endmembers, multistage charging, reaction, or transport fractionation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: