Rationale: Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), classified as nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic type, is an aggressive lymphoma frequently complicated by immune dysregulation. Owing to overlapping histopathological features, particularly Hodgkin/Reed–Sternberg–like cells, AITL may be initially misdiagnosed as Hodgkin lymphoma, leading to delayed recognition and inappropriate management. Patient concerns: A 72-year-old man presented with progressive fatigue, recurrent fever, severe pancytopenia, and splenomegaly after an outside diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma based on inguinal lymph node biopsy. Diagnoses: Laboratory findings revealed hypertriglyceridemia and marked hyperferritinemia, consistent with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Reevaluation of archived lymph node tissue demonstrated Epstein–Barr virus–encoded RNA positivity, T-cell receptor gene rearrangement, and an immunophenotype diagnostic of nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic type with scattered Hodgkin/Reed–Sternberg–like cells. Plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA was detected at low levels. The disease was staged as Lugano stage III with B symptoms and classified as high risk by the International Prognostic Index. Interventions: HLH-directed therapy with etoposide and dexamethasone was initiated for rapid disease control, followed by cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy for lymphoma treatment. Outcomes: Partial remission was achieved after 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy. The patient later experienced disease progression with clinically suspected recurrent HLH despite salvage therapy and died on March 29, 2025. Lessons: This case underscores the diagnostic pitfalls of AITL complicated by HLH and highlights the importance of early pathological reassessment and a stepwise treatment approach prioritizing control of hyperinflammation in patients with discordant clinical and pathological findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: