Authors
Multistatic synthetic aperture radar (MuSAR) formations with a large number of satellites can provide diverse along-track interferometric (ATI) and cross-track interferometric (XTI) baselines, but increasing formation size introduces strong coupling among baseline performance, intersatellite mainlobe safety, minimum separation, and synchronization-link availability. This paper proposes a Mainlobe-Safe Modular Formation Optimization (MSMFO) method for large-scale MuSAR with joint ATI/XTI baseline requirements. A parameterized relative-motion model and a unified evaluation framework are employed to jointly account for baseline compliance, synchronization-link availability, mainlobe conflicts, and intersatellite separation, with mainlobe conflicts and minimum separation imposed as hard constraints. A Multi-Strategy Cooperative Evolution (MSCE) framework combines complementary global search strategies with local refinement, while a two-level center-layer/module-layer architecture enables scalable formation design. Numerical results show that a six-satellite module achieves XTI and ATI baseline compliance rates of 89.17% each, with 99.98% synchronization-link availability and no safety violations. Compared with the best feasible classical formation, the lower of the two baseline compliance rates is improved by 10.89 percentage points. A controlled study spanning 8–96 satellites maintains consistent module-layer performance, high center-layer compliance, 100% joint availability, and zero global safety violations, providing evidence of modular scalability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: