Arsenic contamination of groundwater represents a severe global health hazard, requiring point-of-use technologies that achieve ultra-low residual concentrations while maintaining overall water quality. Here, we evaluate a defect-enriched UiO-66-NH 2 , synthesized via a modulator-assisted solvothermal method , for rapid arsenic mitigation directly in naturally contaminated groundwaters from the Pannonian Basin (Vojvodina, Serbia). At a low dose (0.5 g·L −1 ), UiO-66-NH 2 decreased total dissolved arsenic from ∼227 µg·L −1 to <10 µg·L −1 within 15 min at natural pH (7.80), while simultaneously suppressing phosphate below the limit of detection (LOD, ∼2.9 μg·L −1 P), one of the most competitive oxyanions, demonstrating robustness in complex hydrochemical matrices. Full water-chemistry analysis revealed pronounced selectivity toward arsenic. Changes in other constituents were minimal: Na + and K + (≤ 5% removal), while boron and lithium concentrations remained unchanged. Only moderate reductions in Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ occurred, indicative of a beneficial water-softening side effect. Rapid arsenic uptake occurred within the first minutes of contact, consistent with fast surface adsorption on defect-exposed UiO-66-NH 2 sites. Uptake remained effective across pH 4–9, avoiding the need for pH adjustment. DFT calculations combined with FT-IR spectroscopy support a multi-step adsorption mechanism in which arsenic immobilization is most plausibly governed by inner-sphere coordination at Zr-based adsorption environments, assisted by electrostatic and hydrogen-bonding interactions enabled by the -NH 2 functionality. Unlike laboratory studies using synthetic water, these results demonstrate direct risk mitigation under real exposure conditions, establishing UiO-66-NH 2 as a practical point-of-use adsorbent for arsenic hazard mitigation in real groundwater at environmentally relevant concentrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milić et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: