Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We give counterexamples to the uniqueness assertion for maximum potentials in Theorem 4.7 of Ishibashi's Fixed point theorem for cluster modular groups, arXiv:2603.14338v2. Both a rank-one example and a full-rank type A2 example satisfy its filling conditions and have nontrivial finite modular groups, but their maximum potentials have continua of minimizers. More generally, adjoining a sufficiently large positive integral constant can make any prescribed compact set consist of minimizers. The finite-subgroup fixed-point conclusion is nevertheless preserved: the group-averaged sum of positive Laurent functions with balanced support is coercive and strictly convex in a global logarithmic seed chart. Its unique minimizer is fixed by the group. The logarithm of this sum has the same properties. This gives a replacement proof of the credited fixed-point conclusion using balanced support alone, without the additional slope-span condition. No properness result for infinite cluster modular groups or closure of the original AIM braid-variety question is claimed. This English preprint is AI-assisted, self-audited and unrefereed. Novelty remains undetermined; no independent human review, formal verification or absolute-priority claim is made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alper Ferudun (2026) studied this question.