Construction material reuse is increasingly recognised as an important strategy for improving resource efficiency, reducing construction waste, and supporting the transition towards a circular economy. However, existing assessment approaches primarily evaluate technical, environmental, economic, or health-related aspects independently, providing limited support for comprehensive decision-making regarding material reuse in indoor environments. This study proposes an integrated framework that combines technical performance, indoor environmental quality, environmental sustainability, economic feasibility, and regulatory compliance within a unified assessment methodology. The framework was developed through a structured analysis of the scientific literature, international standards, and regulatory documents related to circular construction and indoor environmental quality. It organises five complementary assessment dimensions into a structured decision-making process that incorporates mitigation, treatment, and reassessment where identified deficiencies are potentially remediable. The proposed framework brings previously fragmented assessment domains into a unified decision-making structure, with explicit consideration of indoor environmental quality and the possibility of mitigation and reassessment, while remaining compatible with existing standards and engineering practice. The framework provides a structured basis for supporting transparent decision-making and the implementation of circular economy principles in indoor construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stankevics et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: