The demand for sustainable construction has intensified the search for structurally viable recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) applications, historically limited by high water absorption, low density, and a weak dual interfacial transition zone (ITZ). This study experimentally evaluates mix designs using supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and fibres against the ACI 363R high-strength threshold (55 MPa) at a low water-to-cementitious (w/c) ratio of 0.32. Seventeen mixes were evaluated across three RCA replacement levels (0%, 34%, 67% by weight) containing fly ash (FA: 15%, 25%), silica fume (SF: 7%, 15%), polypropylene fibres (300, 600 g/m3), and steel chips (3.75 kg/m3). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Welch pairwise t-tests confirmed a statistically significant effect of RCA replacement level on 28-day compressive strength (F(2,6) = 382.3, p < 0.001); at 67% RCA, no mix reached 55 MPa (maximum 46.45 MPa). At 34% RCA, 25% FA achieved a 28-day strength of 59.00 MPa, not significantly different from the natural-aggregate control (p = 0.356). SF15% combined with steel chips yielded the highest flexural (9.90 MPa) and splitting tensile (5.51 MPa) strengths, an improvement over the plain 34% RCA baseline. Based on indirect durability indicators, SF7% showed the most favourable ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV = 4.59 km/s) and lowest water absorption among the 34% RCA mixes. All mixes maintained placement viability (slump > 85 mm) at 1.3% superplasticizer. A multiple linear regression (MLR) model calibrated on the 17-mix dataset predicted 28-day compressive strength (R2 = 0.874, RMSE = 2.03 MPa): f’c (MPa) = 61.35 − 0.265·RCA (%) + 0.169·FA (%) + 0.119·SF (%), in which the RCA and FA terms are statistically significant but the SF term is not. These findings identify 34% RCA as the highest replacement level tested at which the ACI 363R threshold was met, and provide criterion-specific, statistically grounded design guidance for structural RAC within the tested range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nsour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: