Organizations have unprecedented access to information, analytics, and increasingly capable artificial intelligence. Yet the ability to generate more analysis and more answers does not resolve a more fundamental problem: consequential decisions depend on how the situation itself has been understood.A decision can be rational relative to its inputs and still fail because those inputs embody an incomplete or misleading representation of reality.This paper develops a perspective on an upstream layer of complex business decision-making: the construction and challenge of the representation from which a decision emerges.The central proposition is simple: a complex decision should not begin with a fixed problem and a search for answers. It should begin with a representation of the situation explicit enough to be challenged.This perspective does not replace established traditions in problem framing, decision science, systems thinking, causal reasoning, hypothesis testing, or scenario analysis. It asks how these forms of reasoning can contribute to a more reliable representation of a complex business situation before commitment to action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milada Lonskaya (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: