Key result
Higher leisure-time physical activity is linked to ~9% lower ASCVD risk but fails to improve risk prediction.
Why the study?
The performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology pooled cohort equations to predict 10-year ASCVD risk across self-reported leisure-time physical activity levels and the impact of adding physical activity to the model were unclear.
Cohort (n=18,824)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Importance: The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology pooled cohort equations (PCEs) are used for predicting 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Pooled cohort equation risk prediction capabilities across self-reported leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) levels and the change in model performance with addition of LTPA to the PCE are unclear. Objective: To evaluate PCE risk prediction performance across self-reported LTPA levels and the change in model performance by adding LTPA to the existing PCE model. Design, Setting, and Participants: Individual-level pooling of data from 3 longitudinal cohort studies-Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and Cardiovascular Health Study-was performed. A total of 18 824 participants were stratified into 4 groups based on self-reported LTPA levels: inactive (0 metabolic equivalent of task [MET]-min/wk), less than guideline-recommended (<500 MET-min/wk), guideline-recommended (500-1000 MET-min/week), and greater than guideline-recommended (>1000 MET-min/wk). Pooled cohort equation risk discrimination was studied using the C statistic and reclassification capabilities were studied using the Greenwood Nam-D'Agostino χ2 goodness-of-fit test. Change in risk discrimination and reclassification on adding LTPA to PCEs was evaluated using change in C statistic, integrated discrimination index, and categorical net reclassification index. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adjudicated ASCVD events during 10-year follow-up. Results: Among 18 824 participants studied, 10 302 were women (54.7%); mean (SD) age was 57.6 (8.2) years. A total of 5868 participants (31.2%) were inactive, 3849 (20.4%) had less than guideline-recommended LTPA, 3372 (17.9%) had guideline-recommended LTPA, and 5735 (30.5%) had greater than guideline-recommended LTPA level. Higher LTPA levels were associated with a lower risk of ASCVD after adjustment for risk factors (hazard ratio [HR] per 1-SD higher LTPA, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.96). Across LTPA groups, PCE risk discrimination (C statistic, 0.76-0.78) and risk calibration (all χ2 P > .10) was similar. Addition of LTPA to the PCE model resulted in no significant change in the C statistic (0.0005; 95% CI, -0.0004 to 0.0015; P = .28) and categorical net reclassification index (-0.003; 95% CI, -0.010 to 0.010; P = .95), but a minimal improvement in the integrated discrimination index (0.0008; 95% CI, 0.0002-0.0013; P = .005) was observed. Similar results were noted when cohort-specific coefficients were used for creating the baseline model. Conclusions and Relevance: Higher self-reported LTPA levels appear to be associated with lower ASCVD risk and increasing LTPA promotes cardiovascular wellness. These findings suggest the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology PCEs are accurate at estimating the probability of 10-year ASCVD risk regardless of LTPA level. The addition of self-reported LTPA to PCEs does not appear to be associated with improvement in risk prediction model performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pandey et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk (n=18,824). Self-reported leisure-time physical activity vs. Lower physical activity levels was evaluated on Adjudicated ASCVD events during 10-year follow-up (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.96). Higher self-reported leisure-time physical activity was associated with lower ASCVD risk (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.86-0.96), but adding it to the pooled cohort equations did not improve risk prediction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: