Key result
ACC/AHA pooled cohort equations predict real-world ASCVD risk with a good 0.78 c-statistic.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
The performance of the ACC/AHA pooled cohort equation for ASCVD in real-world clinical practice had not been evaluated extensively.
Does the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equation accurately predict ASCVD risk in a real-world community cohort?
Cohort (n=30,042)
Does the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equation accurately predict ASCVD risk in a real-world community cohort?
Effect estimate: c-statistic 0.78
The ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations perform well for predicting ASCVD risk in a real-world community cohort, even when including out-of-range values or statin initiation.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“As such, they are well tailored to begin the discussion regarding risk and need for medical therapy for primary prevention of ASCVD. After this initial step, the personalization of risk to the individual patient through consideration of individual risk-enhancing factors and the use of coronary artery calcium testing in selected patients to reclassify risk, in the context of a clinician-patient discussion, will lead to smarter recommendations regarding which patients should take low-density lipoprotein cholesterol–lowering therapy and which patients may reasonably defer medication initiation.”
“When you have a patient that doesn't fall within the normal numbers of what the original calculator was [when it was] made several years ago, you can still have good enough information to decide whether to start some of this therapy.”
“The study shows that this tool is reliable, not only in light of new cholesterol-lowering drugs, but for patients who previously were not evaluated with the PCE because maybe their blood pressure was higher or lower than the standards, or they did not fit the age profile, for example. By including patients with values outside the accepted range, I think we can calculate the risk for heart attacks in another 20% to 25% of patients, which is not small.”
May warrant caution applying current equations to statin decisions; leaves open need for recalibrated models validated in contemporary cohorts.
BACKGROUND The performance of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association pooled cohort equation (PCE) for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in real-world clinical practice has not been evaluated extensively. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to test the performance of PCE to predict ASCVD risk in the community, and determine if including individuals with values outside the PCE range (ie, age, blood pressure, cholesterol) or statin therapy initiation over follow-up would significantly affect PCE predictive capabilities. METHODS The PCE was validated in a community-based cohort of consecutive patients who sought primary care in Olmsted County, Minnesota, between 1997 and 2000, followed-up through 2016. Inclusion criteria were similar to those of PCE derivation. Patient information was ascertained by using the record linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. ASCVD events (nonfatal and fatal myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke) were validated in duplicate. Calculated and observed ASCVD risk and c-statistics were compared across predefined groups. RESULTS This study included 30,042 adults, with a mean age of 48.5 ± 12.2 years; 46% were male. Median follow-up was 16.5 years, truncated at 10 years for this analysis. Mean ASCVD risk was 5.6% ± 8.73%. There were 1,555 ASCVD events (5.2%). The PCE revealed good performance overall (c-statistic 0.78) and in sex and race subgroups; it was highest among non-White female subjects (c-statistic 0.81) and lowest in White male subjects (c-statistic 0.77). Out-of-range values and initiation of statin medication did not affect model performance. CONCLUSIONS The PCE performed well in a community cohort representing real-world clinical practice. Values outside PCE ranges and initiation of statin medication did not affect performance. These results have implications for the applicability of current strategies for the prevention of ASCVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medina‐Inojosa et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (n=30,042). ACC/AHA pooled cohort equation (PCE) was evaluated on ASCVD events (nonfatal and fatal myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke) (c-statistic 0.78). The ACC/AHA pooled cohort equation demonstrated good overall performance for predicting ASCVD risk in a real-world community cohort (c-statistic 0.78).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: