Key result
Acute hyperoxia suppresses MSNA in males but triggers paradoxical sympathetic activation in ~50% of females.
Why the study?
The efficacy of acute hyperoxia to reduce blood pressure and muscle sympathetic nerve activity remains unclear, particularly regarding sex-dependent responses.
Does acute hyperoxia reduce muscle sympathetic nerve activity and mean arterial pressure differently in healthy females compared to males?
Does acute hyperoxia reduce muscle sympathetic nerve activity and mean arterial pressure differently in healthy females compared to males?
Acute hyperoxia reduces muscle sympathetic nerve activity in males but elicits a bimodal response in young healthy females, suggesting its potential as a sympatho-inhibitory strategy may be limited in females.
Hyperoxia reduces MSNA only in males without lowering MAP in either sex; leaves open sex-specific sympatho-inhibition for future trials.
Acute hyperoxia (100 % oxygen) has been shown to reduce muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), suggesting that hyperoxia could be a potential strategy for lowering blood pressure. However, the efficacy of hyperoxia to reduce blood pressure (e.g., mean arterial pressure; MAP) remains unclear. Therefore, we compared MSNA and MAP responses to acute hyperoxia (1-min pokilocapnic + 3-min, PetO 2 O 2 + 300 Torr) between 18 females and 13 males. Baseline integrated total MSNA was not different between females and males (24 ± 7 vs 23 ± 8 bursts/min, respectively; P = 0.68) while MAP was lower in females than males (85 ± 7 vs 93 ± 7 mmHg; P < 0.01). Overall, hyperoxia evoked reductions in MSNA burst frequency (BF; P = 0.02) but not burst amplitude (BA; P = 0.82) or total MSNA (=BF ∗ BA; P = 0.26), To further probe these responses, 1-min nadir total MSNA response to hyperoxia were extracted within each participant. Total MSNA was reduced from baseline during nadir hyperoxia only in males (sex ∗ cond: P = 0.04). Females exhibited a bimodal distribution of sympatho-inhibitors (F I ) and non-inhibitors (F NI ). F NI demonstrated limited reductions in BF ( P = 0.11 vs inhibitors) coupled with increases in BA ( P < 0.01 vs inhibitors), resulting in no net change in total MSNA (P < 0.01 vs inhibitors). Mechanistically, action potential (AP) detection analyses revealed that F NI increased AP firing during hyperoxia (baseline: 313 ± 172 vs hyperoxia: 404 ± 192 spikes/min; P = 0.02), whereas hyperoxia blunted AP firing in F I (baseline: 387 ± 263 vs hyperoxia: 267 ± 199 spikes/min; P = 0.02). In sum, approximately 50 % of healthy females responded to acute hyperoxia with unexpected increases in AP firing. These data may suggest that benefit of hyperoxia as a sympatho-inhibitor may be limited in young and healthy females.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saboune et al. (2025) studied Healthy (n=31). Acute hyperoxia (100% oxygen) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Total muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) (p=0.26). Acute hyperoxia reduced total muscle sympathetic nerve activity from baseline only in males (P=0.04), whereas ~50% of healthy females exhibited unexpected increases in action potential firing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: