The widely used s vs α stability diagram for ballooning modes is based on the assumption of circular flux surfaces with small shifts. (Here s=rq′/q and α=−R0q2β′.) This analysis is extended to include finite shifts. There again results a universal stability diagram, although in this case it is parametrized by three quantities s, α, and σ′, the differential shift between flux surfaces. The analysis shows that the inclusion of a finite shift leads to a significant further stabilization of the ballooning modes over that from the standard case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choe et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: