Background Split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) are an integral tool in reconstructive surgery. However, donor site management remains challenging, and a standard approach has not yet been established. This is the first study to compare clinical outcomes of a collagen-glycosaminoglycan dermal matrix and a semi-occlusive transparent film dressing for STSG donor site management. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of 20 patients who underwent STSG procedures between January 2020 and June 2021. Donor sites were managed with either a semi-occlusive film dressing ( n = 10) or with the dermal matrix ( n = 10). Outcomes included time to epithelialization, frequency of dressing changes, need for narcotic pain medication and treatment-related adverse events. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, and log-rank tests. Results There were no significant differences between groups with respect to age, sex, comorbidities, or donor site size. The dermal matrix group demonstrated a significantly faster time to epithelialization (11.6 ± 1.3 days) compared with the semi-occlusive dressing group (18.1 ± 2.6 days; P < 0.0001). Dressing changes were significantly reduced in the dermal matrix group, with 30% requiring a single change compared to 100% in the semi-occlusive dressing group ( P < 0.0001). Although not statistically significant, narcotic use was lower in the dermal matrix group (20.0% vs 60.0%; P = 0.0750). No treatment-related adverse events occurred. Conclusion The collagen-glycosaminoglycan dermal matrix significantly accelerated donor site epithelialization and reduced dressing changes compared to semi-occlusive film dressings. These findings suggest that collagen-glycosaminoglycan dermal matrices may improve postoperative outcomes. Further studies are warranted to substantiate these findings and assess broader applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asuku et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: