Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Invasive fungal infections are life-threatening conditions that predominantly affect immunocompromised or critically ill patients, carrying high mortality and morbidity across any fungal species and disease manifestation. Given the scarcity of well-designed clinical trials and complex patient management, antifungal treatment decisions are often tradition-driven rather than evidence-based, resulting in prolonged treatment durations and reluctance to switch to oral regimens. In bacterial infections, a growing body of evidence of large, randomised trials supports shorter antibiotic courses and oral routes, even in severe diseases such as sepsis and bloodstream infections (1–4).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reinhold et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: