Key result
Central adiposity is linked to ~9% greater carotid plaque burden, with sex-specific patterns.
Why the study?
Carotid plaque burden and its association with body fat distribution in a general adult urban population were not well characterized after adjustment for known cardiovascular risk factors.
Cross-Sectional (n=3,321)
No
Relative Risk: 1.09 (95% CI 1.02–1.164)
Age and established cardiovascular risk factors are the primary determinants of carotid plaque burden, with selected body fat distribution measures showing additional but modest covariate-adjusted associations.
Central adiposity metrics show modest sex-specific links to plaque burden; leaves open their incremental value beyond age and traditional risks.
Introduction: Carotid plaques (CP) reflect systemic atherosclerotic burden and may predict cardiovascular (CV) events.Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess CP burden in a general adult urban population and its associations with fat distribution with adjustment for known CV risk factors.Patients and methods: Overall, 3321 participants from the Bialystok PLUS study (Poland) with a complete carotid ultrasound examination and clinical dataset were included, with a median (IQR) age of 49.0 (37.0-62.0)years.Plaques were assessed on ultrasound of 8 extracranial carotid segments.CP presence was defined as at least one plaque-positive segment, and CP burden was quantified as the number of plaque-positive segments across both sides (range, 0-8).Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess body composition.Results: Most participants had no CP (60.1%), whereas CP in 1, 2, 3, 4, and ≥5 segments were observed in 14.1%, 14.8%, 6.0%, 3.3%, and 1.6% of participants, respectively.Plaques were unevenly distributed across carotid segments, clustering at the bifurcation (right 30.1%, left 30.0%).A more central fat pattern was associated with a higher CP burden in women, whereas a more peripheral gynoid fat distribution was associated with a lower burden in men.After adjustment for selected CV risk factors, fat-distribution measures showed modest associations with CP burden in sex-stratified analyses.However, formal interaction tests did not provide statistically significant evidence of heterogeneity by sex.Conclusions: Age and established CV risk factors were the primary determinants of CP burden; however, selected fat-distribution measures showed additional but modest covariate-adjusted associations.(Google LLC, Mountain View, California, United States; accessed May 2026).AI-assisted tools were not used to perform data analyses, generate references, independently interpret the results, or formulate scientific conclusions.All AI-assisted edits and visual materials were critically reviewed and verified by the authors, who take full responsibility for the accuracy, integrity, originality, and final content of the manuscript.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Łaguna et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Carotid plaque burden (n=3,321). Central body fat distribution (waist-to-hip ratio) vs. Lower waist-to-hip ratio was evaluated on Carotid plaque burden (number of plaque-positive segments) (IRR 1.090, 95% CI 1.020-1.164). Higher waist-to-hip ratio in men was associated with a greater carotid plaque burden (IRR 1.090), while higher android-to-total fat ratio was associated with greater burden in women (IRR 1.073).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: